I find it more interesting to study a shot with one question in mind than to search it for every secret in GTA VI at once. For example: what exactly do I want to examine about the street layout? If I start with the assumption that "there will be a robbery here", it becomes easy to turn any suitable building into evidence for a story I have already invented.
I suggest a different order. Open Rockstar's official gallery, choose one collection and ask a narrow question: how is the visible junction arranged, which landmarks help distinguish neighbouring shots, or what blocks the view? The answer should fit into one short note. If answering it requires inventing what lies outside the frame, the question is still too broad.
Next, separate the note into an observation and a follow-up question. "Two roads are visible in the shot" describes the image. "Can you drive between them?" already needs to be tested. This pairing does not kill curiosity: it leaves a specific task for later, rather than a confident conclusion about a mechanic that nobody has tested here.
Take the same question to a second shot. Does it support the observation, add to it or offer no help at all? In the last case, leave the comparison open. Check whether the shots belong to the same place against their labels and the official Leonida index, rather than relying only on similar wall colours.
Finally, save the original link, the image label and one question to test in the game later. That is the result I like: a short note that can be refined after release. It can become a useful starting point for a future article, provided the observation is then checked on a specific platform and game version.